Devuan bug report logs - #297
move accessibility out of task-console-productivity

Package: tasksel; Maintainer for tasksel is Devuan Dev Team <devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org>; Source for tasksel is src:tasksel.

Reported by: KatolaZ <katolaz@freaknet.org>

Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:33:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: bug#297: move accessibility out of task-console-productivity
Reply-To: Arne Wichmann <aw@anhrefn.saar.de>, 297@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-From: Arne Wichmann <aw@anhrefn.saar.de>
Resent-To: devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
Resent-CC: Devuan Dev Team <devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:24:13 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.297.B297.175268655826606@bugs.devuan.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.devuan.org
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 297
X-Devuan-PR-Package: tasksel
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <20190227061610.3ijlbthnjslrxv4a@katolaz.homeunix.net>
X-Devuan-PR-Source: tasksel
Received: via spool by 297-submit@bugs.devuan.org id=B297.175268655826606
          (code B ref 297); Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:24:13 +0000
Received: (at 297) by bugs.devuan.org; 16 Jul 2025 17:22:38 +0000
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:22:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id ZhHNJZ/fd2guZgAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <aw@anhrefn.saar.de>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:21:35 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 59660606; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:21:35 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org;
	dkim=pass header.d=arnium.elogos.de header.i=@arnium.elogos.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=1 header.b=55BRs/2f;
	dkim=pass header.d=anhrefn.saar.de header.i=@anhrefn.saar.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=1 header.b=uxVYx3D7;
	dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=5.199.139.22; helo=arnium.elogos.de; envelope-from=aw@anhrefn.saar.de; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from arnium.elogos.de (arnium.elogos.de [5.199.139.22])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF023E1
	for <297@bugs.devuan.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:21:34 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=arnium.elogos.de; s=1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:
	From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
	Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
	:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=Ain+jhitRU+sxmScAvPeC0wKksaqCbcW61xw2E9qkm8=; b=55BRs/2fMzGvNsn5admCGpsXLn
	qhJAOM6hl137roKtZ+3SfaOIuPrRdS04WZwx3hDSY6sAQH+Ad7jtAxBuRDAw==;
Received: from [192.168.3.66] (helo=anhrefn.saar.de)
	by arnium.elogos.de with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <aw@anhrefn.saar.de>)
	id 1uc5pA-0006Bv-0o
	for 297@bugs.devuan.org;
	Wed, 16 Jul 2025 19:21:42 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=anhrefn.saar.de; s=1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:
	From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
	Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
	:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=Ain+jhitRU+sxmScAvPeC0wKksaqCbcW61xw2E9qkm8=; b=uxVYx3D7vhDPADOhvr/NF/OXyC
	gTn7YAiuhLF3ufKZzCUTmgGB6lA8Ecpmlw6GXCUrnXcuDp/xbUkQ89mdZZBA==;
Received: from aw by anhrefn.saar.de with local (Exim 4.98.2)
	(envelope-from <aw@anhrefn.saar.de>)
	id 1uc5oL-0000000034u-15hr
	for 297@bugs.devuan.org;
	Wed, 16 Jul 2025 19:20:53 +0200
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 19:20:51 +0200
From: Arne Wichmann <aw@anhrefn.saar.de>
To: 297@bugs.devuan.org
Message-ID: <aHffdXV4D8zDOT_2@anhrefn.saar.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="75mUh0IAKCWLsFfQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Is there a consensus on this? I would vote in favour... If there is, what
is blocking this?

cu

YPl
-- 
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Y Plentyn (aw@saar.de)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.

Devuan Bugs Owner <owner@bugs.devuan.org>.
Last modified: Thu Sep 18 08:19:52 2025;