Devuan bug report logs - #339
pump: different licenses mentioned

Full log

🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
From: "Devuan bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.devuan.org>
To: "M. Dietrich" <mdt@emdete.de>
Subject: bug#339 closed by Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> (Re: pump:
 different licenses mentioned)
Message-ID: <handler.339.D339.158282280127613.notifdone@bugs.devuan.org>
References: <20200227165614.GA24071@hindley.org.uk>
 <156236437909.8634.13482421452488798159.reportbug@morple.localnet>
X-Devuan-PR-Message: they-closed 339
X-Devuan-PR-Package: pump
Reply-To: 339@bugs.devuan.org
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:03:04 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1582822984-27624-1"

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the pump package:

#339: pump: different licenses mentioned

It has been closed by Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> by
replying to this email.


-- 
339: https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=339
Devuan Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.devuan.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>

To: 339-close@bugs.devuan.org

Subject: Re: pump: different licenses mentioned

Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:56:14 +0000

On Sat, 06 Jul 2019 00:06:19 +0200 "M. Dietrich" <mdt@emdete.de> wrote:
> Package: pump
> Version: 0.8.24-7.1
> Severity: minor
> 
> The file COPYING is a GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE while the
> file pump.spec tells "License: MIT". The headers in the source
> sound like MIT too. What is the correct license for pump?
> 
> I havent found any repo where the source is maintained (seems
> to have been a CVS versioning). Where was the sourcecode
> downloaded from and where are all the patches maintained?

pump has been removed from Debian and is not in any release since Stretch[1]

So, closing.

Mark

[1]  https://tracker.debian.org/news/1056763/removed-0824-71-from-unstable/

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "M. Dietrich" <mdt@emdete.de>

To: Devuan Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.devuan.org>

Subject: pump: different licenses mentioned

Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 00:06:19 +0200

Package: pump
Version: 0.8.24-7.1
Severity: minor

The file COPYING is a GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE while the
file pump.spec tells "License: MIT". The headers in the source
sound like MIT too. What is the correct license for pump?

I havent found any repo where the source is maintained (seems
to have been a CVS versioning). Where was the sourcecode
downloaded from and where are all the patches maintained?

-- System Information:
Distributor ID:	Devuan
Description:	Devuan GNU/Linux beowulf/ceres
Release:	10
Codename:	n/a
Architecture: x86_64

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages pump depends on:
ii  libc6     2.28-10
ii  libpopt0  1.16-12
ii  netbase   5.6

pump recommends no packages.

Versions of packages pump suggests:
pn  resolvconf  <none>

-- no debconf information

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.