From unknown Fri Mar 29 07:41:09 2024 Received: (at 421) by bugs.devuan.org; 5 Apr 2020 09:00:02 +0000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: devuanbugs@dyne.org Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.0.beta4) for (single-drop); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 09:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (mohindley.plus.com [81.174.245.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041F2F60C54 for <421@bugs.devuan.org>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 10:49:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=apollo) by mx.hindley.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL0xg-0006ur-UY; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 09:49:01 +0100 Received: from mark by apollo with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL0xf-0003iT-T9; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 09:48:59 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:48:59 +0100 From: Mark Hindley To: Adrian Zaugg , 421@bugs.devuan.org Subject: Re: bug#421: isc-dhcp-client: no ipv6 prefix set automatically Message-ID: <20200405084859.GM4674@hindley.org.uk> References: <20200404210028.27039.35048.reportbug@ente.limmat.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200404210028.27039.35048.reportbug@ente.limmat.ch> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: No Thanks User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on tupac3.dyne.org Control: tags -1 debian On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 11:00:28PM +0200, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > Package: isc-dhcp-client > Version: 4.3.5-3+deb9u1 > Severity: important > > Requesting an address over dhcp6 does not set the ipv6 prefix length. The address received seems always get > a /128 prefix set, even if the dhcp6 server sends another one. Adrian, Thanks for this. However isc-dhcp-client is not a forked package and Devuan uses the Debian pacakges directly. You would be better reporting this directly to Debian's BTS. Thanks. Mark