Devuan bug report logs - #435
Need to document techniques for building packages depending on libsystemd-dev

Package: libelogind0; Maintainer for libelogind0 is Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>; Source for libelogind0 is src:elogind.

Reported by: andrewbass@gmail.com

Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:33:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: ceres, chimaera, patch

Merged with 562, 574, 609

Fixed in version 243.8-1

Done: dak@devuan.org

Full log

Message #66 received at 435@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 435) by bugs.devuan.org; 28 Jan 2025 16:27:08 +0000
Return-Path: <andrew@bower.uk>
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:27:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id iN9JJBgFmWdXGAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <andrew@bower.uk>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:26:00 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 79E0421B; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1; helo=mx2.mythic-beasts.com; envelope-from=andrew@bower.uk; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx2.mythic-beasts.com (mx2.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A03191D
	for <435@bugs.devuan.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <andrew@bower.uk>)
	id 1tcoPW-003Ku6-IP; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:25:58 +0000
Received: from ajb85 by arden.ab8.net with local (Exim 4.98)
	(envelope-from <andrew@bower.uk>)
	id 1tcoPS-000000003mW-2rh5;
	Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:25:54 +0000
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:25:54 +0000
From: Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk>
To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>, 435@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: Re: bug#435: [vlc] Unable to build the vlc package as it requires
 libsystemd-dev
Message-ID: <Z5kFEqdCwW_VmsAe@arden.ab8.net>
References: <20200430001911.09fc09ad@proxima.2ka.mipt.ru>
 <20200430085019.GA14953@hindley.org.uk>
 <CADSg1JjfqgXBZBL+1hYLwiRJvGbUkc0-ZsoLmDsS5BY9FSrzXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200430001911.09fc09ad@proxima.2ka.mipt.ru>
 <20200430125958.GB32762@hindley.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200430125958.GB32762@hindley.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 0

Hi Mark,

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:59:58PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> That is currently the case for libsystemd0/libelogind0 only at runtime. Doing
> libelogind-dev provides libsystemd-dev concerns me as I think we might introduce
> FTBFS until we know that all source packages will build with either. Given the
> number of source packages in Debian, that is a lot of testing. Hence why we
> currently follow Debian and only build against libsystemd-dev.

What's the difference with Debian that means I don't have this problem
there? I.e., I can merrily install libsystemd-dev without losing my
desktop integration.

Thanks,

Andrew

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

Devuan bug report logs - #435 Need to document techniques for building packages depending on libsystemd-dev

Devuan bug report logs - #435
Need to document techniques for building packages depending on libsystemd-dev