From unknown Fri Mar 29 13:48:27 2024 Received: (at 625) by bugs.devuan.org; 24 Oct 2021 07:10:02 +0000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: devuanbugs@dyne.org Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119] by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.0.beta4) for (single-drop); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vm6.ganeti.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3340F609FA for <625@bugs.devuan.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 09:04:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from apollo.hindleynet ([192.168.1.3] helo=hindley.org.uk) by mx.hindley.org.uk with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meXYN-0004Er-CP; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 08:04:23 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 28413 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:04:22 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 08:04:22 +0100 From: Mark Hindley To: 625@bugs.devuan.org Cc: bbonev@ipacct.com Subject: Re: bug#625: amprolla generates InRelease without arch:all Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on tupac3.dyne.org Boian, Thanks for this. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 03:49:49AM +0300, Where all about bugs in Devuan packages is reported wrote: > Package: amprolla > Version: chimaera > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: bbonev@ipacct.com > > It was reported on #devuan that "apt-file search" does not find some files > while it finds others. The files in question were in arch:all packages. > apt-file makes apt-get also fetch Contents-* and apt-get skips Contents-all > on chimaera. > > It was also reported that the same works fine in beowulf and bullseye. > > After further checking, beowulf's and chimaera's InRelease does not have all > in the arch list while bullseye has it. I think there is something else going on here. If it works in beowulf but beowulf's InRelease doesn't have arch:all in the list, that can't be the cause. Arch all packages are (now) supposed to be duplicated in all the binary-*/Packages files. Can you give me an example package which is missing? The significant thing is whether it is a forked or unforked package. That may point to a DAK configuration error. Thanks Mark