Devuan bug report logs - #741
xfe: Not working as defautl file manager

version graph

Package: xfe; Maintainer for xfe is (unknown); Source for xfe is src:xfe.

Reported by: Echedey L贸pez Romero <elr@disroot.org>

Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 19:16:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 1.43.2-3

Full log


馃敆 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: bug#741: xfe: Not working as defautl file manager
Reply-To: Echedey L贸pez Romero <elr@disroot.org>, 741@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-From: Echedey L贸pez Romero <elr@disroot.org>
Resent-To: devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
Resent-CC: devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.741.B741.167562171628154@bugs.devuan.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.devuan.org
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 741
X-Devuan-PR-Package: xfe
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
References: <167553794257.1071.2302441720545342899.reportbug@echedey-devuan-pc> <Y99bChcVMYwHEHWo@hindley.org.uk> <167553794257.1071.2302441720545342899.reportbug@echedey-devuan-pc>
Received: via spool by 741-submit@bugs.devuan.org id=B741.167562171628154
          (code B ref 741); Sun, 05 Feb 2023 18:30:01 +0000
Received: (at 741) by bugs.devuan.org; 5 Feb 2023 18:28:36 +0000
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2001:41d0:2:d06e::5c4:2612]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Sun, 05 Feb 2023 18:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id v2toByD132NSHwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <elr@disroot.org>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 18:27:44 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 16ACBAFF; Sun,  5 Feb 2023 18:27:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=178.21.23.139; helo=knopi.disroot.org; envelope-from=elr@disroot.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A190B25
	for <741@bugs.devuan.org>; Sun,  5 Feb 2023 18:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAD3413CB;
	Sun,  5 Feb 2023 19:27:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id KAYpE659LRMl; Sun,  5 Feb 2023 19:27:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 18:27:32 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
	t=1675621657; bh=6Xsx7HNp1uYaH1MW5NCZC6E7+C9PUiWPrXaC+1gwjMA=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
	b=k+kHbCZqdK6qfKfLnEY0duAYha4jbCTQqD9Z7vaunMG6qAEenbr+xeKf3dMFIUs2P
	 bGRHmSHSIPnWTpiapO7VRdnTVg+mTs2VBTHrIWktApoLPJ3JQ/KvrBvTB7iLn0RwWz
	 Mv11AWsWO39pmhfdBCYZljVaIWAmAB+6+KzY987wWWf/Wxs4E3e1uFCldVmCfca4yg
	 x8kaVqwH512UAGmyoffKGYLzSkI6iGqOdxteth6EZZ8BLrN9nnIkqQfsXYm4MPGUXj
	 jVR5SgErrC2Lyq0wcNtW9HlIypl3lg1kEj+KHtiLWg8aXEoTTHg+GDYixdOZa9w1Wd
	 0tuzxPOSH9HFQ==
From: Echedey L贸pez Romero <elr@disroot.org>
To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Cc: 741@bugs.devuan.org
Message-ID: <20230205182732.7bbc8f0d@echedey-devuan-pc>
In-Reply-To: <Y99bChcVMYwHEHWo@hindley.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/np67lSrMUZ0vuuFty13x.Ng";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Good afternoon and thank you for your quick reply.

> In xfe is not a forked package in Devuan and we use Debian's packages
> directly without recompilation. So, in principle, bugs about xfe
> should be reported to Debian's BTS to be addressed.
> 
> However, you need more detail here before you submit this to Debian.
> What are you trying to do or expecting to happen? 

Okay, I will likely try that then.

> That maybe. Have you tried to configure the inode/directory mimetype
> to open in xfe? You can probably do that in ~/.mailcap.

I have tried that right now. I didn't try that before because I was not
aware of it (I even tried checking the mimetype for folders before
without finding anything).

It seems to not making any effect in any application.

-- 
Regards,
Echedey L贸pez Romero
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.

Devuan Bugs Owner <owner@bugs.devuan.org>.
Last modified: Sat Sep 28 21:38:59 2024;