Devuan bug report logs - #822
Screensaver with only blank does not work after suspend

version graph

Package: linux-image-6.5.0-2-amd64; Maintainer for linux-image-6.5.0-2-amd64 is (unknown);

Reported by: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@ethgen.ch>

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 16:24:02 UTC

Severity: critical

Tags: debian, moreinfo

Found in version 6.5.6-1

Full log


🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: bug#822: Screensaver with only blank does not work after suspend
Reply-To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>, 822@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-From: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Resent-To: devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
Resent-CC: devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:32:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.822.B822.171093780831149@bugs.devuan.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.devuan.org
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 822
X-Devuan-PR-Package: linux-image-6.5.0-2-amd64
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <ZZLmfXE77fQDVNf6@ikki.ethgen.ch> <ZZLmfXE77fQDVNf6@ikki.ethgen.ch>
Received: via spool by 822-submit@bugs.devuan.org id=B822.171093780831149
          (code B ref 822); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:32:01 +0000
Received: (at 822) by bugs.devuan.org; 20 Mar 2024 12:30:08 +0000
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:30:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id CoUGH6nW+mWjUwAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <mark@hindley.org.uk>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:29:29 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 4DD994A0; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.36.131.86; helo=mx.hindley.org.uk; envelope-from=mark@hindley.org.uk; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mx.hindley.org.uk (193-36-131-86.cfwn.uk [193.36.131.86])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E443F8
	for <822@bugs.devuan.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:29:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hindley.org.uk (apollo.hindleynet [192.168.1.3])
	by mx.hindley.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id CDD24B7;
	Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:29:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (nullmailer pid 12697 invoked by uid 1000);
	Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:29:27 -0000
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:29:27 +0000
From: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
To: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@ethgen.ch>, 822@bugs.devuan.org
Message-ID: <ZfrWpzOGXYCU3dEr@hindley.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZZLmfXE77fQDVNf6@ikki.ethgen.ch>
Control: tags -1 debian moreinfo

Klaus,

Thanks for this.

On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 05:21:17PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: linux-image-6.5.0-2-amd64
> Version: 6.5.6-1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> 
> I report that bug here as debian systemd evangelists start to even
> reject bug reports that are unrelated to the location of the files just
> because you don't commit to there systemd centric world.

Is this still an issue?

None of the packages concerned here are forked in Devuan. Can you reproduce it
on a Debian system?

Mark

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.

Devuan Bugs Owner <owner@bugs.devuan.org>.
Last modified: Mon Nov 25 06:54:22 2024;