Home | Devuan | Git | Forum | Packages | Popcon
Donate now!
Download

Devuan bug report logs - #844
systemd-boot-efi: Broken man pages

version graph

Package: systemd-boot-efi; Maintainer for systemd-boot-efi is (unknown); Source for systemd-boot-efi is src:systemd.

Reported by: murzik <lorietta2023@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:02:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: debian

Found in version 252.22-1~deb12u1

Full log

🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: bug#844: systemd-boot-efi: Broken man pages
Reply-To: murzik <lorietta2023@gmail.com>, 844@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-From: murzik <lorietta2023@gmail.com>
Resent-To: devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
Resent-CC: devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:26:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.844.B844.171219744623580@bugs.devuan.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.devuan.org
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 844
X-Devuan-PR-Package: systemd-boot-efi
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: debian
References: <KUJVAS.IZEOYIY8E6H11@gmail.com> <ZgHty6rlNk2w1_bp@hindley.org.uk> <2L5DBS.T9QOCYZP64CK@gmail.com> <Zg1HY4IVQZ9OgjH7@hindley.org.uk> <KUJVAS.IZEOYIY8E6H11@gmail.com>
Received: via spool by 844-submit@bugs.devuan.org id=B844.171219744623580
          (code B ref 844); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:26:01 +0000
Received: (at 844) by bugs.devuan.org; 4 Apr 2024 02:24:06 +0000
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:24:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id DS4JEyIPDmYjXQAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <lorietta2023@gmail.com>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:23:30 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 32B28408; Thu,  4 Apr 2024 02:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=TEwvXEjw;
	dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::744; helo=mail-qk1-x744.google.com; envelope-from=lorietta2023@gmail.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com (mail-qk1-x744.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::744])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0064F
	for <844@bugs.devuan.org>; Thu,  4 Apr 2024 02:23:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-789dbd9a6f1so27647985a.1
        for <844@bugs.devuan.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712197402; x=1712802202; darn=bugs.devuan.org;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:subject:from
         :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=43bG3DdNTi5/fjEPnEznt1Yt8OtVa/ke4kPE1aOiKQ8=;
        b=TEwvXEjw7anO5wUcLr3ybdeVbU3/UZqDdQrcmHFzHWd2+vpLutEtwaf+j97UUfbaHT
         NTfRAfIiRCVjQO00GhpoN/EGfuC/Ix6fSMMJfjEv3eVowdbBMjQ+9Yxsdr1WTAPvlaaE
         EB6gMt+ieBhfCvHPBNoTQxbaHX/H5S9Sxeeux+y3RB3hnt39J1f5y9wFyM1h/3N70hmB
         FLV0MhKbI8PE9jnDKQ+tASVPcass6tPbnm33JdTlhdfxFTXn2uxDx62SMM95cyLWkvG7
         yjjkxGiQZ5bhS6uK6pnxHcVuKCDvZ7Hxo6bpkM4HJt55kVQfnRKHBd//O/+hHerfXtkN
         aKtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712197402; x=1712802202;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:subject:from
         :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=43bG3DdNTi5/fjEPnEznt1Yt8OtVa/ke4kPE1aOiKQ8=;
        b=ga/n08IfSYaz4cDq98mMYw/VgbalbZxPkn4p7mm2/51DuwkDnMl+3+YxltxUg4Ez0b
         DTo/EximQ1gs3yYtgm05tqLEiUbMJKjsXu9GZmaEW6L1+hB/w3/yeb34tDRrqCnc9+JF
         VW4tWoNNwUWrcHF7FYMQwoeNfjBhVkSQUugI5Lvyj0cU2pb+eXG4zadtAu95iEhSr2oV
         PvE2tbZcxYSKqahFKWVQS2myb+78rPrudo1X3pvs8TZhTBkii6rO5SnUP5cy0IvocGP+
         ql88MjTcbJ2toZXWE9C1IF3PwcVVFjT0TTOcS7DcNUE5/uVrab7UqZkPd7lcbT7N0GUA
         BaYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YySIcdzAcrugs+wytPn4f8HutnSwHyJieSsV+UxAZVOAJFGDUC5
	VAlDtot8bTrE27mhYJ4Iy6P5mCEOsYFBaT2Pz+/8Na+GQf4mvLVU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGce1ujsA5WSUunQg8SRS6pXckrUE+lEtKcvhzk/kp/H6bvduH57oqbbAlzYP+obiyBU6avOQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5cd1:0:b0:431:2a50:a853 with SMTP id s17-20020ac85cd1000000b004312a50a853mr1248008qta.48.1712197401741;
        Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.70] ([188.113.129.247])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bx3-20020a05622a090300b0043140b00476sm5891835qtb.83.2024.04.03.19.23.18
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:23:34 +1100
From: murzik <lorietta2023@gmail.com>
To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Cc: 844@bugs.devuan.org
Message-Id: <AZBEBS.E6KQ4JL5T64G@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Zg1HY4IVQZ9OgjH7@hindley.org.uk>
X-Mailer: geary/43.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-64pkH2CWY8tyofRLg410"

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange decision. 
this file will most likely be moved from the systemd package, or even 
just a copy of it added to the package.
Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
inconvenience
Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange decision. 
this file will most likely be moved from the systemd package, or even 
just a copy of it added to the package.
Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
inconvenience
Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange decision. 
this file will most likely be moved from the systemd package, or even 
just a copy of it added to the package.
Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
inconvenience
Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange decision. 
this file will most likely be moved from the systemd package, or even 
just a copy of it added to the package.
Also, I found an alternative - stubby 
https://github.com/puzzleos/stubby.
so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
inconvenience.
I'll report it to debian bug tracker later.

On Wed, Apr 3 2024 at 01:11:15 PM +01:00:00, Mark Hindley 
<mark@hindley.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:07:50PM +1100, murzik wrote:
>>     As far as I can tell, the project has experience in this.
>>     we already have systemd-bootchart; systmed-sysusers-standalone;
>>     systemd-tpmfiles-standalone; systemd-oomd.. I don't think adding 
>> one
>>     standalone package will be a problem.
> 
> All of those are Debian packages. Devuan doesn't produce any systemd
> standalone packages.
> 
> Mark


[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.

Devuan Bugs Owner <owner@bugs.devuan.org>.
Last modified: Sun Sep 29 00:13:05 2024;