Home | Devuan | Git | Forum | Packages | Popcon
Donate now!
Download

Devuan bug report logs - #844
systemd-boot-efi: Broken man pages

version graph

Package: systemd-boot-efi; Maintainer for systemd-boot-efi is (unknown); Source for systemd-boot-efi is src:systemd.

Reported by: murzik <lorietta2023@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:02:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: debian

Found in version 252.22-1~deb12u1

Full log

Message #30 received at 844@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 844) by bugs.devuan.org; 4 Apr 2024 02:34:38 +0000
Return-Path: <lorietta2023@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:34:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id 8G9hDnsRDmbEXQAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <lorietta2023@gmail.com>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:33:31 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id F2CCC408; Thu,  4 Apr 2024 02:33:30 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=ilt6a5BC;
	dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e41; helo=mail-vs1-xe41.google.com; envelope-from=lorietta2023@gmail.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mail-vs1-xe41.google.com (mail-vs1-xe41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e41])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA7B4F
	for <844@bugs.devuan.org>; Thu,  4 Apr 2024 02:33:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe41.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-479c176f926so226239137.0
        for <844@bugs.devuan.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712198003; x=1712802803; darn=bugs.devuan.org;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:subject:from
         :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=LB4WIWPmIVramohcr1G0xG2PVLYTuaIzTXnqtDEkRWQ=;
        b=ilt6a5BCvFa8/+y7mGlniNL+LWkztUpFNd6p/wX2Dyk/AP6/KGEB8A3gOcoLOe9Xzv
         9QLWRZs4bxno+5HHykp4bea0/9HPNXznRQgL/RMQi0KBuS7ppkhDQn5JpIvPnXTsTo4I
         EYjTtYN4pUPtXVkvieNcZNXiavISNbIaEz0JPFqK/PmqQBReJDNu2kPIYBIFCNFSuk2K
         QL+owfM1AsSC+uSYa5mH/5dnvrhaSmTopszhJ/ZFovFC0IJijFS+2ZRXabT+ohzUWheM
         ityBxe5nrmghxUAXZSNnLxe1vlksBLX6ghCe0sux6wg3nfTZzjKz3rPUIp4fWRcub2TJ
         nCgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712198003; x=1712802803;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:subject:from
         :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=LB4WIWPmIVramohcr1G0xG2PVLYTuaIzTXnqtDEkRWQ=;
        b=aRmR2EjA4RGBRgukkkTraemnPXG2vFub6+sKOwmto0oxlBJDqHLLuslE4kuRktt5c8
         VsYDyssENPGhA/iMcVSo6cxxLcVRIu01wod58nDPhVkwfwfh06n5uxnH/AoeikLZ6/71
         r5fRAQlOe77jyw/+hDA5rH7XNgOrbEZC4Bfrt3rc7kMkFmRJN2ZRGAKV7RAI/fl7WncP
         8yID9WcJAxcHwN6DrgIuXadRoiYnGlWLfEWBu6nS2yOdmevUt9HUVxizSm8HA7P8I8Sc
         JmCHKI7x97SWRNpKZ2NO1f0l2c08xmjxNFKTmOurnwsBqL+SPtcz1pL1ji42buSI9+xK
         /nAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yze2nQisYUHGtoj1lo7Dykh11HAKNKiuS2iG83PoUMsV8fL29lb
	cMtxf1ahhGLz71qRl5BGRxnIol5SjAUy54KUIcxRHW8OF3hxR1P/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmGr2MWoBBMZKJF89FVIj2jjvQGXegO+PdDYh9njAULpgykjSBxyOq01vo0GXpaKsVp1JBvQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a67:bd0e:0:b0:478:88b6:ccb8 with SMTP id y14-20020a67bd0e000000b0047888b6ccb8mr1050382vsq.28.1712198003291;
        Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.70] ([188.113.129.247])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kd3-20020a056214400300b006990f6854e3sm1313665qvb.67.2024.04.03.19.33.20
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:33:38 +1100
From: murzik <lorietta2023@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#844: systemd-boot-efi: Broken man pages
To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Cc: 844@bugs.devuan.org
Message-Id: <2GCEBS.H8M2OQ62JOBD2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AZBEBS.E6KQ4JL5T64G@gmail.com>
References: <KUJVAS.IZEOYIY8E6H11@gmail.com>
	<ZgHty6rlNk2w1_bp@hindley.org.uk> <2L5DBS.T9QOCYZP64CK@gmail.com>
	<Zg1HY4IVQZ9OgjH7@hindley.org.uk> <AZBEBS.E6KQ4JL5T64G@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: geary/43.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-fog8QokKaKRnMtX8tMr0"

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange decision. 
this file will most likely be moved from the systemd package, or even 
just a copy of it added to the package.
Also, I found an alternative - stubby 
<https://github.com/puzzleos/stubby>.
so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
inconvenience.
I'll report it to debian bug tracker later.

On Thu, Apr 4 2024 at 01:23:34 PM +11:00:00, murzik 
<lorietta2023@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange 
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd 
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
> inconvenience
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange 
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd 
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
> inconvenience
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange 
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd 
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby core.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
> inconvenience
> Interesting. but it seems to me that adding a dependency on systemd 
> because of one (!!) documentation file will be a very strange 
> decision. this file will most likely be moved from the systemd 
> package, or even just a copy of it added to the package.
> Also, I found an alternative - stubby 
> https://github.com/puzzleos/stubby.
> so even if a dependency on systemd is added, it shouldn't cause any 
> inconvenience.
> I'll report it to debian bug tracker later.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 3 2024 at 01:11:15 PM +01:00:00, Mark Hindley 
> <mark@hindley.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:07:50PM +1100, murzik wrote:
>>>     As far as I can tell, the project has experience in this.
>>>     we already have systemd-bootchart; systmed-sysusers-standalone;
>>>     systemd-tpmfiles-standalone; systemd-oomd.. I don't think 
>>> adding one
>>>     standalone package will be a problem.
>> 
>> All of those are Debian packages. Devuan doesn't produce any systemd
>> standalone packages.
>> 
>> Mark


[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

Devuan BTS -- Powered by Debian bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.

Devuan Bugs Owner <owner@bugs.devuan.org>.
Last modified: Sun Sep 29 00:20:03 2024;