ulogd2: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d

Package: init-system-helpers; Maintainer for init-system-helpers is Devuan Dev Team <devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org>; Source for init-system-helpers is src:init-system-helpers.

Reported by: Opty <opty77@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:50:15 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: debian, moreinfo

Merged with 881, 882, 883

Found in version init-system-helpers/1.65.2devuan1

Done: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>

Full log

🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: bug#884: /etc/logrotate.d/ulogd2: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d
Reply-To: Opty <opty77@gmail.com>, 884@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-From: Opty <opty77@gmail.com>
Resent-To: devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
Resent-CC: devuan-dev@lists.dyne.org
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:02:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.884.B884.174359529227410@bugs.devuan.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.devuan.org
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 884
X-Devuan-PR-Package: ulogd2
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: debian
References: <CAERDJOGtf3XB+nLODWsNRBYxsYeWkvupTssK-_w=DrdUS08cXQ@mail.gmail.com> <Z-wX9-KBTHMnyKom@hindley.org.uk> <CAERDJOGtf3XB+nLODWsNRBYxsYeWkvupTssK-_w=DrdUS08cXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Received: via spool by 884-submit@bugs.devuan.org id=B884.174359529227410
          (code B ref 884); Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:02:01 +0000
Received: (at 884) by bugs.devuan.org; 2 Apr 2025 12:01:32 +0000
Delivered-To: bugs@devuan.org
Received: from email.devuan.org [2a01:4f9:fff1:13::5fd9:f9e4]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.devuan.org
	by email.devuan.org with LMTP
	id OOsjDvEm7WceGAAAmSBk0A
	(envelope-from <opty77@gmail.com>)
	for <bugs@devuan.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:00:49 +0000
Received: by email.devuan.org (Postfix, from userid 109)
	id 222F2642; Wed,  2 Apr 2025 12:00:49 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: email.devuan.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=Qn7ojV7T;
	dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on email.devuan.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c; helo=mail-ot1-x32c.google.com; envelope-from=opty77@gmail.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c])
	by email.devuan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEFF5173
	for <884@bugs.devuan.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2025 12:00:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7231e216a06so827899a34.2
        for <884@bugs.devuan.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 05:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743595246; x=1744200046; darn=bugs.devuan.org;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
         :message-id:reply-to;
        bh=cR/kc9VxtMo9wbVojGZBA9NhuWytLRi9P1rpDPTW9qY=;
        b=Qn7ojV7TCGqpd3U9UAHOHAZF+5quBFr7KiYi8Y92fpHJlrvyaKId/onFW/42o4zkez
         hAr/u/4dj6EC38LrFg+ef0KwGITso17ASyLUPsiOimN/0m2djVjXKiMZsOl3Yc5mIWm1
         1tI0Wpihc3MgiDon0YEYLUD2nPLNt9+L14V7leMZyUoCmYNfX0zJbFar733NbwykBFwY
         WUm0yPBSMg3QOoH5lcQ+p4JFZzuuf1M674vI/Pqqn1rnxtjwkCUMoFe52BIlAvQXZ52s
         P8MaJuLs8Rne98bkOfVgBWTK0+VrDergNkj5L5zTiNQMjFoGXwcRdrPvKUdQh+6aKLVr
         OTvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743595246; x=1744200046;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
         :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=cR/kc9VxtMo9wbVojGZBA9NhuWytLRi9P1rpDPTW9qY=;
        b=qs22tNh4yILeMKhxJNd9y8El+W875rQB3lZ2p5HxhM94FCZG9DG4yEmWSkxDBFlPrr
         2LsSPL/HACU7PAtU9GMq5eD/FuG0ZyRzF+6oji9vO/0m4f7YwZkoDAWzkCvEI9TORzZi
         tWqsNMqBan6NSOIuCELDbBZtgN/Aueobm9yyltP2bp/Z1dVIFj3M8jDFS02q7ULYz9nl
         qttpCg/dcODtAQ3X3+gqAoflNaOX9hovj5hXcP5+Koy9CPyXjBcP6FlWTPQKhJn+Tbv7
         AsTW+2jkdWuzoL1wwOqByzbK5Y/pE8TU4Gm0O1e63ogDbe+zCzUkkJAn8VyzgkmATtXf
         ZYyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXJrdzIUCHEd2bspu4CpCTWLe5EyRCI2rmXjJSQXRp22MsCYDT
	1t9CJs3kDoHEjgoBWcR7B7z0CExQ6oe+Ww/Qx9S+5UW5g7auobDO1lMJqUIK/JIcq8GRwosRgRq
	u7++ceUy1ii0CoQhw1qEQCvgWOJj36TLeAdM=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncstQ0Ou/EvqsrRsWDg5SvBv8r/wLJBlymGZpOktO459gHmGHeuyn4PY+aQFgCO
	SC24STw+hDPR6/z7RBfwLKGXdrN8qH72pWETAgYaieHiqTlBA6Z6hmGTH6IAmiDr79HfsBqDBFt
	/6JaiRRdVwhqKX3zT79TRNTBoSc+VmQi5qdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHX0gKChGkD8ZI1wowqhNc2Cq+USstZ/pmcWM92ROGSG1t4GsfgPa4LkCMlN+CNVj0HfTPS/brFxR3x6Nld0PU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:a082:b0:29e:723c:8e9d with SMTP id
 586e51a60fabf-2cc3b6c85e5mr1141775fac.4.1743595246110; Wed, 02 Apr 2025
 05:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Z-wX9-KBTHMnyKom@hindley.org.uk>
From: Opty <opty77@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:00:35 +0200
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JpR6o2ue7JZ_y5_gbYw-7Lpg8HmHdzrEobqw6NJATF6iE7iEWYtP5Sz9lE
Message-ID: <CAERDJOGrYXVqAv4jd6E+P_D5x7cY8hx6CEWfxyp0QhCApzpNhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Cc: 884@bugs.devuan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 6:44 PM Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> wrote:
> Possibly, but I am not sure. Certainly all the other /etc/logrotate.d examples I
> can find use invoke-rc.d. It may be to prevent rotation in chroots and the like
> when it would fail. Also, if you have prevented services from starting int he
> first place, there is no need to rotate the logs later. Why do you have
> policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all installed? What is your intention in doing that?

Please see #881 or should I copy the story here as well?

> However, I am sure that ulogd2 isn't forked in Devuan and so this should be
> reported directly to Debian's BTS if you really think there is an issue.

Now that Debian uses systemd by default I considered Devuan a better
place for System V style init stuff but I will think about reporting
to Debian BTS then.

Regards,
Opty

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

Devuan bug report logs - #884 /etc/logrotate.d/ulogd2: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d

Devuan bug report logs - #884
/etc/logrotate.d/ulogd2: Questionable use of invoke-rc.d