Devuan bug report logs -
#656
reportbug: Adding check for debian imported packages
Reply or subscribe to this bug.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org, Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
:
bug#656
; Package reportbug
.
(Sun, 16 Jan 2022 15:34:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Alexandros Prekates <aprekates@posteo.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
.
(Sun, 16 Jan 2022 15:34:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.10.3+devuan1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
i think it would be more user friendly :-) reportbug to check if a package is
unforked , because now the sender must crosscheck for if the package s(he)
reports for is unforked and imported from debian and then
to launch reportbug with --bts debian
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
INTERFACE="gtk"
** /home/chomwitt/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "7.10.3+devuan1"
mode standard
ui gtk
email "aprekates@posteo.net"
smtphost "posteo.de"
smtpuser "aprekates@posteo.net"
smtptls
-- System Information:
Distributor ID: Devuan
Description: Devuan GNU/Linux 4 (chimaera)
Release: 4
Codename: n/a
Architecture: x86_64
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-7-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: runit (via /run/runit.stopit)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 2.2.4+devuan1
ii python3 3.9.2-3
ii python3-reportbug 7.10.3+devuan1
ii sensible-utils 0.0.14
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
ii claws-mail 3.17.8-1+b1
pn debconf-utils <none>
pn debsums <none>
pn dlocate <none>
ii emacs-bin-common 1:27.1+1-3.1
ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-transport-agent] 4.94.2-6
ii file 1:5.39-3
ii gnupg 2.2.27-2
pn python3-urwid <none>
ii reportbug-gtk 7.10.3+devuan1
ii xdg-utils 1.1.3-4.1
Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 2.2.4+devuan1
ii file 1:5.39-3
ii python3 3.9.2-3
ii python3-apt 2.2.1
ii python3-debian 0.1.39
ii python3-debianbts 3.1.0
ii python3-requests 2.25.1+dfsg-2
ii sensible-utils 0.0.14
python3-reportbug suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Information forwarded
to devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
:
bug#656
; Package reportbug
.
(Sun, 16 Jan 2022 16:06:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #8 received at 656@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Alexandros,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 03:33:09PM +0000, Alexandros Prekates wrote:
> Package: reportbug
> Version: 7.10.3+devuan1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> i think it would be more user friendly :-) reportbug to check if a package is
> unforked , because now the sender must crosscheck for if the package s(he)
> reports for is unforked and imported from debian and then
> to launch reportbug with --bts debian
Yes, A am aware that this is desirable and it is in hand. Although it is not
quite as straightforward as it may appear to be sure to avoid spamming the wrong
BTS.
I hope to have it implemented in daedalus.
Mark
Information forwarded
to devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
:
bug#656
; Package reportbug
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:40:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:40:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #13 received at 656@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
I have a patch proposal for reportbug that offers to send reports on unforked
packages to Debian's BTS.
The default choice remains as Devuan.
For packages with 'Origin: Devuan' or 'devuan' in the version, Devuan's BTS is
used without question.
What do you think?
Thanks
Mark
[0001-Offer-to-send-bugs-in-unforked-packages-directly-to-.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org, Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
:
bug#656
; Package reportbug
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:46:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Ralph Ronnquist <ralph.ronnquist@gmail.com>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:46:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #18 received at 656@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:38:37 +0000
Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a patch proposal for reportbug that offers to send reports on
> unforked packages to Debian's BTS.
>
> The default choice remains as Devuan.
>
> For packages with 'Origin: Devuan' or 'devuan' in the version,
> Devuan's BTS is used without question.
>
> What do you think?
That sounds right, yes.
Ralph.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org, Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
:
bug#656
; Package reportbug
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:50:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Boian Bonev <bbonev@ipacct.com>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:50:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #23 received at 656@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On Mon, 2022-02-21 at 11:38 +0000, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a patch proposal for reportbug that offers to send reports on unforked
> packages to Debian's BTS.
>
> The default choice remains as Devuan.
>
> For packages with 'Origin: Devuan' or 'devuan' in the version, Devuan's BTS
> is used without question.
>
> What do you think?
The good thing is that will save lots of time processing bugs against not
forked packages. :)
My only concern is how that would be accepted in Debian, because from what I
have seen in bug reports and discussions, Devuan is not well accepted, at least
from the hard systemd proponents... If people could set aside politics this
change is for the good of all
With best regards,
b.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=292f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Information forwarded
to devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
:
bug#656
; Package reportbug
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:30:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:30:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #28 received at 656@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Control: tags -1 patch
Boian,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:46:58PM +0200, Boian Bonev wrote:
> My only concern is how that would be accepted in Debian, because from what I
> have seen in bug reports and discussions, Devuan is not well accepted, at least
> from the hard systemd proponents... If people could set aside politics this
> change is for the good of all
Yes, I agree. Although the effect of the patch is just to offer the choice of
sending to Debian to the user. It doesn't force it and the default remains the
same: i.e. send to Devuan. Also that choice has always been there with the
-B/--bts option anyway. So it really just makes it easier for the user to choose
and invites them to think about their choice (I hope!).
Best wishes
Mark
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Added tag(s) patch.
Request was from Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
to 656-submit@bugs.devuan.org
.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:30:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent
to dak@devuan.org
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:42:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to Alexandros Prekates <aprekates@posteo.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:42:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #35 received at 656-done@bugs.devuan.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Version: 11.4.0devuan2
Source package reportbug (11.4.0devuan2) added to Devuan suite unstable.
This closes bug report 656.
Thanks
DAK managing the Devuan archive
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:22:39 +0000
Source: reportbug
Architecture: source
Version: 11.4.0devuan2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Changed-By: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
Closes: 381 656
Changes:
reportbug (11.4.0devuan2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Revert "Send to Devuan BTS by default (Closes: #381)." This change is
no longer required now lsb_release returns the correct Distributor ID.
* Offer to send bugs in unforked packages directly to Debian, but still
default to Devuan. (Closes: #656)
Checksums-Sha1:
2a27ef5d2064600ef027963a747165fe90737068 1523 reportbug_11.4.0devuan2.dsc
b7c54b1c0a50db7e59d643153e3e34ec298356fb 206416 reportbug_11.4.0devuan2.tar.xz
adbee16e246aa010529899790ecbb267eb74ed1d 5616 reportbug_11.4.0devuan2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
f78aeafe86411c5ae2a9dab723063d287c5f403feaeefc7a93261674f2ee93a0 1523 reportbug_11.4.0devuan2.dsc
6b4d1e4bc0330bd17762989a7f5d2afa788df43ea817c84b1495b26549723e74 206416 reportbug_11.4.0devuan2.tar.xz
1052cd0015a5da30b5454e50044d59acd9106f03cbda716005531429adbfb754 5616 reportbug_11.4.0devuan2_source.buildinfo
Files:
061f290ea505acee8baffc6b804b8711 1523 utils standard reportbug_11.4.0devuan2.dsc
e8deda0f0179d68a9d461d8e82696ed0 206416 utils standard reportbug_11.4.0devuan2.tar.xz
fcfc3dee5b6dcb137d336ecfc9274d27 5616 utils standard reportbug_11.4.0devuan2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEcuPLdzMV36LkZHQ9lFMhJFQZIvsFAmIVH2MACgkQlFMhJFQZ
IvtM8wf5AZs3UpBJuUXKVXi3+4MTdZf3PlT5FpbYlg4bJrXz+pHGj5WUxyNdWHuF
xCFS8KcYhze5UV46BLnbkryQdUN/Kv+JykO9YL2lyLryjO/Hrutgooi3nyY6w0uS
ZcHb01MW8YKXhp7WEV0KsSPDvf8pqJe73xxisks6M6tgwGJ1H6am1c96UDFLtMq9
I0VgHi/NEkPMlUKHilWyzN763Vvft8otVlcLL7bDxy5Pxbi1rUeRINfNDvRoXH4F
S7P+RZ4w/66AT+h8pJhP0xPs54wygbdeeRlNiwRsiQQu2H+OvPi8fQCmXnT6WUIe
hPFdN7ldOIuEtK/l9F8ONpf/f8MUXA==
=Xp6s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.