Devuan bug report logs - #656
reportbug: Adding check for debian imported packages

Package: reportbug; Maintainer for reportbug is Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>; Source for reportbug is src:reportbug.

Reported by: Alexandros Prekates <aprekates@posteo.net>

Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 15:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 7.10.3+devuan1

Fixed in version 11.4.0devuan2

Done: dak@devuan.org

Full log

🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Subject: bug#656: Reportbug BTS
Reply-To: Boian Bonev <bbonev@ipacct.com>, 656@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-From: Boian Bonev <bbonev@ipacct.com>
Resent-To: devuan-bugs@lists.dyne.org
Resent-CC: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.devuan.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:50:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.656.B656.16454584907572@bugs.devuan.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.devuan.org
X-Devuan-PR-Message: followup 656
X-Devuan-PR-Package: reportbug
X-Devuan-PR-Keywords: 
References: <YhN5vRDPFC+kJTSM@hindley.org.uk> <164234718957.11783.13125556123318352941.reportbug@enous>
Received: via spool by 656-submit@bugs.devuan.org id=B656.16454584907572
          (code B ref 656); Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:50:01 +0000
Received: (at 656) by bugs.devuan.org; 21 Feb 2022 15:48:10 +0000
Delivered-To: devuanbugs@dyne.org
Received: from tupac3.dyne.org [195.169.149.119]
	by doc.devuan.org with IMAP (fetchmail-6.4.16)
	for <debbugs@localhost> (single-drop); Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.bul.net (mx1.bul.net [195.85.215.56])
	by mail.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913E366135C
	for <656@bugs.devuan.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:47:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx1.bul.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 4FDC860A8F; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:47:06 +0200 (EET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.dyne.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
Received: from purple.bonev.com (purple.bonev.com [195.85.215.215])
	by mx1.bul.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538DC60A39
	for <656@bugs.devuan.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:47:02 +0200 (EET)
Received: (qmail 31607 invoked by uid 64020); 21 Feb 2022 17:47:01 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.10.6?) (bbonev@ipacct.com@195.85.215.8)
  by purple.bonev.com with AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2022 17:47:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4b8e6dc325b5fd5d254497f78e5c228b578df2c7.camel@ipacct.com>
From: Boian Bonev <bbonev@ipacct.com>
To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk>, Ralph Ronnquist
	 <ralph.ronnquist@gmail.com>
Cc: 656@bugs.devuan.org
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:46:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <YhN5vRDPFC+kJTSM@hindley.org.uk>
Organization: IPACCT Ltd.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

On Mon, 2022-02-21 at 11:38 +0000, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a patch proposal for reportbug that offers to send reports on unforked
> packages to Debian's BTS.
> 
> The default choice remains as Devuan.
> 
> For packages with 'Origin: Devuan' or 'devuan' in the version, Devuan's BTS
> is used without question.
> 
> What do you think?

The good thing is that will save lots of time processing bugs against not
forked packages. :)

My only concern is how that would be accepted in Debian, because from what I
have seen in bug reports and discussions, Devuan is not well accepted, at least
from the hard systemd proponents... If people could set aside politics this
change is for the good of all

With best regards,
b.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=292f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

Devuan bug report logs - #656 reportbug: Adding check for debian imported packages

Devuan bug report logs - #656
reportbug: Adding check for debian imported packages